Similar presentations:
Negotiation principles
1. Negotiation Principles
Managing Technical People2.
Topics and AgendaWhat is Negotiation?
Negotiation Styles
Preparing for Negotiations
Conducting Negotiations
Influencing Factors
Exercise 11: Negotiation
2
3.
Course ProgressModule 0: Factors Influencing Human Interaction
Module 01: Communication
Module 02: Decision Making
Module 03: Negotiation
Class 13: Negotiation Principles
• Class 16: Capstone Project: Part 02
• Class 14: Video Analysis 03
• Class 17: Case Study 02
• Class 15: Role Play 03
Module 04: Conflict Management
Module 05: Relationship Management
Module 06: Leadership
3
4.
What Is Negotiation?“You can get much farther with a kind word and a gun than
you can with a kind word alone.”
Al Capone
American Gangster
“If you can't go around it, over it, or through it, you had
better negotiate with it.”
Ashleigh Brilliant
Artist and Writer
4
5.
What Is Negotiation?• Occurs when goals are potentially:
• Interdependent
• Incompatible
• What is the purpose in a negotiation?
• Deal making
• Decision making
• Dispute resolution
• Others?
Negotiating Globally: How to Negotiate Deal, Resolve Disputes, and Make Decisions across Cultural Boundaries. Jeanne M. Brett
5
6.
What Is Negotiation?• Small or large in scale
• Deal with mundane tasks or global issues
• Can take place between:
• Two individuals
• Designated agents
• Coalitions or groups
6
7.
Influencing FactorsWhy is negotiation sometimes hard for “techies”?
7
8.
Negotiation StylesHigh
Competitive
Win at all cost
Win-lose
Assertiveness
Collaborative
Win-win
Compromise
Split the difference
Avoiding
Lose-lose
Accommodating
Lose to win
Low
Low
Cooperativeness
High
8
9. Competitive
When quick, decisive action is vital—for example, in anemergency
On important issues when unpopular courses of action need
implementing—for example, cost cutting, enforcing
unpopular rules, discipline
On issues vital to company welfare when you know you’re
right
When you need to protect yourself from people who take
advantage of noncompetitive behavior
9
10. Collaborative
When you need to find an integrative solution and theconcerns of both parties are too important to be
compromised
When your objective is to learn and you wish to test your
assumptions and understand others' views
When you want to merge insights from people with different
perspectives on a problem
When you want to gain commitment by incorporating others’
concerns into a consensual decision
When you need to work through hard feelings that have been
interfering with a relationship
10
11. Avoiding
When an issue is unimportant or when other, more important issues arepressing
When you perceive no chance of satisfying your concerns—for example,
when you have low power or you are frustrated by something that would
be very difficult to change
When the potential costs of confronting a conflict outweigh the benefits
of its resolution
When you need to let people cool down—to reduce tensions to a
productive level and to regain perspective and composure
When gathering more information outweighs the advantages of an
immediate decision
When others can resolve the issue more effectively
When the issue seems tangential or symptomatic of another, more basic
issue
11
12. Accommodating
When you realize that you are wrong—to allow a bettersolution to be considered, to learn from others, and to show
that you are reasonable
When the issue is much more important to the other person
than it is to you—to satisfy the needs of others and as a
goodwill gesture to help maintain a cooperative relationship
When you want to build up social credits for later issues that
are important to you
When you are outmatched and losing and more competition
would only damage your cause
When preserving harmony and avoiding disruption are
especially important
When you want to help your employees develop by allowing
them to learn from their mistakes
12
13. Compromise
When goals are moderately important but not worth theeffort or the potential disruption involved in using more
assertive modes
When two opponents with equal power are strongly
committed to mutually exclusive goals—as in labor–
management bargaining
When you want to achieve a temporary settlement of a
complex issue
When you need to arrive at an expedient solution under time
pressure
As a backup mode when collaboration or competition fails
13
14.
Preparing For NegotiationsFactors that influence parties’ rigidity or flexibility:
BATNA: Best Alternative To Negotiating an Agreement
Aspiration: This is what I am really hoping to get
Reservation: This is where my bottom line is
14
15.
Example: Purchasing A HouseFactors
Examples
BATNA
• Buy another house
• Remodel or upgrade
current house
• Continue to rent
Aspiration
• Preferred or target price
buyer would like to pay
Reservation
• Highest price buyer will pay
15
16.
Example: Selling A HouseFactors
Examples
BATNA
• Look for another potential
buyer
• Take house off the market
• Convert house into rental
unit
Aspiration
• Preferred or target price
seller would like to receive
Reservation
• Lowest price seller will
accept
16
17.
Example: Job OfferFactors
Examples
BATNA
Aspiration
• Preferred or target salary
potential employee would
like to receive
Reservation
• Lowest salary potential
employee will accept
Consider another job offer
Look for another job offer
Keep current job
Retire
17
18.
Example: Software RequirementsFactors
Examples
BATNA
?
Aspiration
?
Reservation
?
18
19.
Example: Software RequirementsFactors
Examples
BATNA
Aspiration
Preferred or target set of requirements
that:
• Developers would like to develop
• Customer would like to have
developed
• Most extensive and complicated set of
requirements to which the developers
will agree
• Least extensive and complicated set of
requirements to which the
client/customer will agree
Reservation
Trade-off other requirements
Decline contract
Find another client/customer
Find another product/service provider
19
20.
Bargaining PowerBargaining Power: Ability to achieve good outcomes
Sources of Bargaining Power
• Preparation for negotiations
• Capability to persuade others
• Good BATNA
• Creativity
• Opportunity and willingness to
create value for others
• Strong relationships
• Knowledge about other side
20
21.
Conduction Negotiations: Getting To YesThe Problem
People bargain over positions
The Method
Separate the people from the problem
Focus on interests not positions
Invent options for mutual gain
Insist on using objective criteria
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In: Roger Fisher and William Ury
21
22.
Conducting Negotiations: Inventing Options For Mutual GainWhat’s wrong
in theory?
What’s wrong
in the real
world?
Step 2
Analysis
Step 1
The
Problem
Step 3
Approaches
Step 4
Action
Ideas
Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In: Roger Fisher and William Ury
What might
be done in
theory?
What might
be done in
the real
world?
22
23.
Influencing Factors: Context• Principals vs. agents
• Do you have a direct stake in the negotiation?
• Trust
• Do you believe in the other party’s words, actions, and decisions?
• Emotions
• Are your emotions helping or hurting the negotiation?
• Justice
• Do you think you are being treated fairly or unfairly?
23
24.
Influencing Factors: CultureInterests
and
Priorities
Potential for
Integrative
Agreement
Interests
and
Priorities
Culture A
Negotiator
Type of
Agreement
Culture B
Negotiator
Strategies
Pattern
of
Interaction
Strategies
Adapted from Culture and Negotiation: Jeanne M. Brett
24
25.
Influencing Factors: Medium• How might negotiations be affected by the medium that’s used?
25
26.
Influencing Factors: CommunicationSkilled Negotiators:
Avoid:
Use:
• Irritators
• Testing Understanding and Summarizing
• Counterproposals
• Asking Questions
• Defend/Attack Spirals
• Feelings Commentary
The Effective Negotiator — Part I: The Behaviour of Successful Negotiators : Neil Rackham and John Carlisle
26
27.
Influencing Factors: PersonalityStudy included looking at four elements:
Two negotiation scenarios were presented:
Extroversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness and Intelligence
Win-Lose / Distributive
Win-Win / Integrative
Predictions?
Win-Lose
Win-Win
“Should You Be a Negotiator”: Ray Friedman and Bruce Barry
27
28.
Influencing Factors: PersonalityResults:
Win-Lose - Conscientiousness and intelligence had no effects.
Win-Win – Extroversion or agreeableness had no effects.
Do you think the results of the Friedman and
Barry study seem reasonable?
“Should You Be a Negotiator”: Ray Friedman and Bruce Barry
28
29.
Influencing Factors: PersonalityRelater
Thinker
Socializer
Director
29
30.
You have 30 minutesComplete
Exercise 13
30