Task 4 INPRO Action Plan “Legal and Institutional Issues of Nuclear Energy Supply by TNIs”: Scope, Contents, Definitions
Definitions
Transportable Nuclear Installation
INPRO domestic team: Transportable Nuclear Installations
Russian home team: Transportable Nuclear Installations
Subject of the study
Fundamental approaches
Two main extreme approaches
Scenarios
Domestic INPRO team: Reference Life Cycle Scenarios
Russian home team: Reference Life Cycle Scenarios
Issues structure
Issues Hierarchy (Russian home team)
Issues Hierarchy (INPRO Domestic team)
Issues studied
Liability for nuclear damage (Domestic INPRO team)
Liability for nuclear damage (Russian home team)
Safeguards
Safeguards
Nuclear Safety (Domestic INPRO team)
Nuclear Safety (Russian home team)
Transport (Domestic INPRO team)
Transport (Russian home team)
Physical Protection (Domestic INPRO team)
Physical Protection (Russian home team)
147.50K
Categories: lawlaw industryindustry

INPRO Action Plan “Legal and Institutional Issues of Nuclear Energy Supply by TNIs”: Scope, Contents, Definitions

1. Task 4 INPRO Action Plan “Legal and Institutional Issues of Nuclear Energy Supply by TNIs”: Scope, Contents, Definitions

Lev Alekseevskiy
(RRC “Kurchatov Institute)

2. Definitions

3. Transportable Nuclear Installation

The term “nuclear installation” has a number of
definitions under different international
instruments:
Convention on Nuclear Safety: limited to “landbased civil nuclear power installation”
Paris and Vienna Liability Conventions: exclude
any reactor with which means of sea or air
transport is equipped

4. INPRO domestic team: Transportable Nuclear Installations

• “could be assembled and pre-tested at the
factory”
• “does not operate during the
transportation”
• no special requirements for the user's
industrial and nuclear infrastructure
• turnkey contract basis
• can be returned to the manufacturer for
maintenance or in the case of an accident

5. Russian home team: Transportable Nuclear Installations


Serial production
Factory fabrication and pre-testing
Entirely removed at the end of the lifetime
Minimal requirements for regional
infrastructure

6. Subject of the study

Fundamental approaches

7. Fundamental approaches

Two main extreme approaches
• Incorporation into existing institutional
framework (almost without any changes)
• Creation of a specific institutional
framework (“all over again”)
Some reasonable compromise
has to be found!

8. Two main extreme approaches

Scenarios

9. Scenarios

Domestic INPRO team: Reference
Life Cycle Scenarios
• “Domestic” scenario
• “Export” scenario
– Supplier is operator
– Receiving entity is operator
• “Outsourcing” scenario

10. Domestic INPRO team: Reference Life Cycle Scenarios

Russian home team: Reference
Life Cycle Scenarios
• “Domestic” scenario
• “International” scenario (“Supplier is
responsible for everything”)

11. Russian home team: Reference Life Cycle Scenarios

Issues structure

12. Issues structure

Issues Hierarchy
(Russian home team)
GENERAL SAFETY AND SECURITY
Environmental
issues
Financial issues
Energy supply
issues
Non-proliferation
issues
Radiological
safety
Physical
Protection
Nuclear
safety
NFC
Financial
schemes
Monitoring and
accounting
Supply
assurance
Liability
Safeguards

13. Issues Hierarchy (Russian home team)

Issues Hierarchy
(INPRO Domestic team)
LEGAL
ISSUES
INFRASTRUCTURE
ISSUES
Safeguards
Outlook
(Role of IAEA)
Transport
Physical
Protection
Liability
NFC
“MILESTONES”
DOCUMENT
Issues of
Jurisdiction
Nuclear
Safety
National position
Stakeholder Involvement
Nuclear safety
Supporting Facilities
Management
Environmental Protection
Funding and Financing
Emergency Planning
Legislative Framework
Security
Safeguards
Nuclear Fuel Cycle
Regulatory Framework
Radioactive Waste
Radiation Protection
Industrial Involvement
Electrical Grids
Procurement
Human Resources

14. Issues Hierarchy (INPRO Domestic team)

Issues studied

15. Issues studied

Comparison of the issues considered
DOMESTIC
INPRO TEAM
RUSSIAN HOME
TEAM
1 Nuclear Safety
+
+
2 Nuclear Fuel Cycle
+
in progress
3 Physical Protection of Nuclear Material
+
+
4 Legal framework for Transport of TNIs
+
+
5 Outlook (Role of the IAEA)
+

6 Liability for Nuclear Damage
+
+
7 Safeguards/Non-proliferation
+
+
8 Infrastructure issues/
approach difference
ISSUES

16.

Additional issues of the study
(Russian home team)
ISSUES
STATUS
1
General safety and security
+
2
Monitoring, accounting and control of Nuclear
Materials
+
3
Economic schemes for TNI project
implementation
+
4
Regulatory framework for TNI’s serial
production
in progress
5
Licensing
in progress
6
Standardization, certification and test centers
in progress
7
Emergency planning
8
Human resources
9
Rules for announcing and providing services by
TNIs
10
Legal support of international TNI project
in progress
11
Legal support of Russian national TNI project
in progress

17.

Liability for nuclear damage
(Domestic INPRO team)
Two main assumptions:
1) Liability system for TNIs will be based on
the existing international instruments
2) TNIs is considered with respect to Vienna
Convention (VC)
As a result the list of the issues that need
further elaboration is presented.

18. Liability for nuclear damage (Domestic INPRO team)

Liability for nuclear damage
(Russian home team)
What has been done:
• Review of international legal instruments
related and their applicability to TNIs
• Options for the liability transitions during
the life cycle of the TNI
• An expert estimation of the nuclear
insurance contribution to the electricity
cost

19. Liability for nuclear damage (Russian home team)

Safeguards
Russian home team: considered not only
safeguards but all the elements of nonproliferation regime
Both teams considered various specific
scenarios of TNI deployment

20. Safeguards

The main conclusions of the teams are practically
the same. And they are as follows:
• There is nothing that differentiates TNIs from
conventional stationary nuclear installations with
regards to safeguards.
• In respect of non-proliferation TNIs are
sufficiently covered by the existing institutional
arrangements and do not require development
of new rules and norms.

21. Safeguards

Nuclear Safety
(Domestic INPRO team)
The section contains the detailed review of
the legal instruments applicable:
• Binding: Conventions related to Nuclear
Safety
• Non-binding: Safety Principals,
Requirements, Standards

22. Nuclear Safety (Domestic INPRO team)

Nuclear Safety
(Russian home team)
The section contains the analysis of how the
specific features of TNIs and their life
cycle influence the nuclear safety
requirements for them.
As a result the list of the regulations
recommended to develop is presented.

23. Nuclear Safety (Russian home team)

Transport
(Domestic INPRO team)
The section contains a review of the legal
instruments related to the transport of TNIs:
• Binding:
– Law of the Sea
– SUA Treaties and 2005 Protocols
– Other binding modal instruments
• Non-binding:
– Safety norms
– Security norms

24. Transport (Domestic INPRO team)

Transport
(Russian home team)
What has been done:
• Review of the existing legal framework
related to nuclear equipment or material
transport
Output:
• Recommendations for the future
development of the legal framework for
TNI transport

25. Transport (Russian home team)

Physical Protection
(Domestic INPRO team)
Physical Protection section is presented as a
part of Nuclear Safety section. It considers
legal instruments related to the issue.
Binding: CPPNM and 2005 Amendment, UN
Security Council Resolutions UNSCR 1540
etc.
Non-binding: INFCIRC/225 (Rev.4)

26. Physical Protection (Domestic INPRO team)

Physical Protection
(Russian home team)
Identified:
• Specific features of TNIs that are
substantial with respect to physical
protection
• Specific threats that must be taken into
account during the particular TNI project
phase:
– Design phase
– Transportation to the operation site
– Operation phase

27. Physical Protection (Russian home team)

Thank you
English     Русский Rules