Motivation Losses and Gains in Teams
Plan
Key features of motivation for people in teams
Coordination problem
Social loafing and the Ringelmann effect
Cures for social loafing
Building an effective team
Types of tasks
Expectancy theory: one more time)
Reducing low motivation and productivity in groups
Making individual contributions indispensable
Decreasing or eliminating the physical and psychological costs of contributing
900.12K
Category: englishenglish

Motivation Losses and Gains in Teams

1. Motivation Losses and Gains in Teams

Tamene Keneni Walga
Aleshkovskaya Tatiana
Steblovskaya Ksenia

2. Plan

Key
features
Social
loafing and
the
Ringelmann
effect
Social
facilitation
Teams,
tasks &
motivation
Expectancy
theory

3. Key features of motivation for people in teams

Expertise
Collaboration

4.

Each team member has to
be viewed as able to make
her/his own contribution
to team goals.
If expertise of one
member is not
appreciated team
members may have to be
replaced.

5. Coordination problem

+

6. Social loafing and the Ringelmann effect

INDIVIDUALS
exert less effort
on a task if they
are in a group
versus when they
work alone
INDIVIDUAL
MEMBERS of a
group become
increasingly less
productive as the
size of their group
increases
Ringelmann effect
Social loafing
Social loafing and the Ringelmann
effect

7. Cures for social loafing

Involvement
involving tasks
social compensation
Identification
with the group

8. Building an effective team

Group
composition
Steiner’s
social
combination
theory
Taxonomy of
tasks and task
demands

9. Types of tasks

Type
Description
Additive Task
completed by cumulative combining
of members’ input
Compensatory Task
completed by averaging together
individual members’ solutions or
recommendations
Disjunctive Task
completed when a single solution,
decision, or recommendation is
adopted by the group
Conjunctive Task
completed successfully only if all
group members contribute

10. Expectancy theory: one more time)

Expectancy theory
individuals can be expected to work toward a particular outcome
a) if they value the behavior or the outcome (high value)
(b) if they perceive a contingency between their behavior and
the outcome (high expectancy).
Low motivation arises when individuals:
1. Perceive no value to contributing;
2. Perceive no contingency between their contributions and
achieving a desirable outcome;
3. Perceive the costs of contributing to be excessive.

11. Reducing low motivation and productivity in groups

External incentives
Internal incentives
Economic
(money, bonuses)
Value of collective
performance
Social
(liking, social approval, recognition)
Intrinsically interesting task

12. Making individual contributions indispensable

Personal contributions
crucial in achieving the desired outcome
If personal contributions are withheld collective good may be
unfulfilled
4 ways to reach:
increasing the difficulty of the task,
increasing the uniqueness of ones contributions,
each personal contributions -> attaining the collective good,
instructing individuals directly that their contributions are
necessary.

13. Decreasing or eliminating the physical and psychological costs of contributing

Change the nature
of the tasks: from
collective to
individual
Instructing
individuals that their
co-workers will not
reduce their efforts
Instructing
members that any
kind of defection
will be punished
English     Русский Rules