Conformity
Is Conformity Good or Bad?
Why Conform?
Definitions
Asch Line Judgment Experiments
Solomon Asch
You cannot be serious!
Asch
Why conform?
Influences on Conformity in Asch
Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority
Milgram – Obedience
Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority
Other Variables and Thoughts to Consider
Ethical Implications
310.00K
Category: englishenglish

Conformity Quotes

1. Conformity

How similar are we to sheep and
lemmings?

2. Is Conformity Good or Bad?

• Due to our upbringing in American culture,
individuality has a certain allure
• But
– Another word for individualist is deviant
– Another word for conformist is team player
• Obviously, there are times where conformity, and
obedience, are crucial
• Despite Hollywood’s depiction, research
(Schacter; Kruglanski) shows that the conformist
is liked more

3. Why Conform?

• Our sanity depends to
some degree on the belief
that everyone sees the
same world that we see
• If this belief is challenged,
we’d rather change what
we see (or what we say we
see) than admit to
ourselves (or others) that
we see a different world

4. Definitions

• Conformity: a change in attitude
or behavior due to the real or
imagined presence of others.
• Compliance: a change in behavior, but not
attitude, due to the results of social pressure.
• Acceptance: a change in both behavior and
attitude.

5.

Solomon Asch:
Compliance in an
Unambiguous
Situation

6. Asch Line Judgment Experiments

Stimulus
A
B
C

7. Solomon Asch

• Asch (1951;1956) completed two studies that
demonstrate how easily conformity occurs
• Naïve subject is brought into lab with 6-8
confederates
• Asked to make a judgment about line length
• Subject is seated next to last
• In 12 of 18 trials confederates provide the wrong
answer – DV is whether subject follows
• Ordinarily subjects make mistakes 1% of the time,
in this experiment 36.8% of the time

8. You cannot be serious!

9. Asch

• Results:
• 33% went along with the group on a majority of the trials
• 25% remained completely independent
• 75% conformed at least once
• When tested alone (no confederates), subjects got more
than 98% of the judgments correct
• When tested with confederates, they only got 66% of the
judgments correct

10. Why conform?

• Confusion
• Informational pressure
• Embarrassment
• Normative pressure
• 2 more versions of the experiment
• Compliance, NOT internalization

11. Influences on Conformity in Asch

• Size of group: as group size increases to 3 others,
conformity increases. After that, little change
• Presence of one dissenter decreases conformity
immensely
• If dissenter disagrees with both it still reduces conformity
• The more wrong the majority was, the less influence
• The greater the privacy, the less conformity
– Accuracy versus approval issue
– Also known as informational vs. normative influence.

12. Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority

• Participants brought into “experiment on
learning through punishment”.
• Participant is always the “teacher,” the
confederate is always the learner.
• Everytime that the learner is wrong on a
word recognition task the teacher must
administer a shock, with the shock
increasing by 15 volts with each incorrect
answer.

13. Milgram – Obedience

14. Stanley Milgram: Obedience to Authority

• As the voltage increases, the “learner’s”
objections become more vehement until they stop
responding altogether at 345 volts.
• The question becomes, when do participants
absolutely refuse to continue (they have to say
they won’t continue 4 consecutive times in order
for the experimenter to stop the experiment).
• 65% of the participants went all the way to the end
(450 volts).

15. Other Variables and Thoughts to Consider

• Milgram manipulated a number of different
variables:




Distance between learner and teacher.
Distance between experimenter and teacher.
Location of the study.
Whether the participant was the “shocker” or
just an observer.
• Foot in the Door/Cognitive Dissonance.
• Fundamental Attribution Error.

16. Ethical Implications

I observed a mature and initially poised businessman enter
the laboratory smiling and confident. Within 20 minutes he
was reduced to a twitching, stuttering wreck, who was
rapidly approaching nervous collapse. He constantly pulled
on his ear lobe, and twisted his hands. At one point he
pushed his fist into his forehead and muttered ' Oh God, let's
stop it '. And yet he continued to respond to every word of
the experimenter, and obeyed to the end."
English     Русский Rules