14.27M
Category: ecologyecology

Plastics

1.

N U F Y P C 1 5 T E A M P R O J E C T P R E S E N TAT I O N
Plastics
Made by Taikozha Turdyakyn, Adil Leiman,
Zhansaya Chembayeva and Bekbarys Aidaraliyev

2.

What are the current effects of plastics during
disposal on the environment and what can
we do to change this?
TEAM PROJECT'S TITLE

3.

OUTLINE
M A I N P O I N T S R E L AT E D TO T H E
TO P I C
The urgency of the problem: Benefits and Drawbacks
Pros and cons of different methods of disposal
Effect on environment
Possible solutions

4.

URGENCY
W H Y I T I S S O I M P O R TA N T ?

5.

Benefits
IRREPLACEABLE
most
common
and popular tool
TO O
L
FLEXIBILITY TO USE
USE IN VARIOUS FIELDS
U S E I N D A I LY L I F E
automotive, agricultural, health,
construction/building, packaging, and
textiles
to store food, water, and household
tools
variety of sizes and shapes
because of its features

6.

TO X I C TO T H E
E N V I R O N M E N T A N D TO
HUMANITY
M O S T C O M M O N P O L L U TA N T

7.

50%
OF PLASTIC HAS BEEN PRODUCED IN
T H E PA S T 1 5 Y E A R S
2 M M TO 3 8 1 M M
INCREASE IN PLASTIC PRODUCTION FROM
1 9 5 0 A N D 2 0 1 5 , W H I C H P R E D I C T E D TO
DOUBLE BY 2050

8.

Methods of disposal
PROS AND CONS
There are three methods of
disposal.

9.

F I G U R E 1. L I F E C Y C L E O F P O LY M E R M AT E R I A L S .
S O U R C E : ( R AGA E R T E T A L . , 2 0 1 7 )

10.

3 different methods
Figure 2. Discarding.
Source: (Interesting Engineering, 2018)
DISCARDING
Most common
Too much place
Affects the environment
Economically
unprofitable
Figure 3. Incineration.
Source: (IPEN, 2019)
Figure 4. Recycling.
Source:
(Advanced Waste Solutions, 2019)
I N C I N E R AT I O N
R E C YC L I N G
Release of toxic
substances
Released heat can be
used
Most beneficial
Reusing
Non-incineration
method should be
used

11.

Effect on environment
GREENHOUSE
EFFECT
EFFECT ON
SURROUNDING
AREAS
EFFECT ON
PLANTS
EFFECT ON
ANIMALS

12.

POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS
REDUCING PLASTIC
CONSUMPTION IN
D A I LY L I F E
• Keeping out of
unnecessary packaging
• Eco-fiendly alternatives
U S I N G B I O D E G R ADAB L E
P O LY M E R S
• Ability to decompose
• Renewable biogenic carbon contained
• C-14 product signature as a indicator of
biogenic carbon's proportion
• Should be economically obtainable and
suitable in use

13.

F I G U R E 5 . C A R B O N - 1 4 S I G N AT U R E O F B I O - A N D
P E T R O C H E M I C A L P O LY M E R S .
SOURCE: (SONG ET AL., 2009)

14.

Conclusion
• Disposable tableware, bags, packaging, bottles, and various
containers are in daily usage today.
• All of them harm the environment.
• Recycling, incineration, and discarding are different types of disposal.
• Only 5% is recycled.
• Reduce production and use of plastic is the best solution
• Popularization of other alternatives
• Preventing environmental disaster

15.

Q&A SECTION

16.

Reference list
• Rodrigues, M., Abrantes, N., Gonçalves, F., Nogueira, H., Marques, J., & Gonçalves, A. (2019). Impacts of plastic
products used in daily life on the environment and human health: What is known? Environmental Toxicology and
Pharmacology, 72, 103239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2019.103239
• Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances,
3(7), e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
• Verma, R., Vinoda, K. S., Parireddy, M., & Gowda, A. N. (2016). Toxic Pollutants from Plastic Waste - A Review.
Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 701-708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2016.07.069
• Prata, J. C., Silva, A. L., Costa, J. P., Mouneyrac, C., Walker, T. R., Duarte, A. C., & Rocha-Santos, T. (2019). Solutions
and Integrated Strategies for the Control and Mitigation of Plastic and Microplastic Pollution. International Journal of
Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(13), 2411. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16132411
• Ragaert, K., Delva, L., & Van Geem, K. (2017). Mechanical and chemical recycling of solid plastic waste. Waste
Management, 69, 24 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.07.044
• Stefanini, R., Borghesi, G., Ronzano, A., & Vignali, G. (2020). Plastic or glass: a new environmental assessment with a
marine litter indicator for the comparison of pasteurized milk bottles. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-020-01804-x
• Song, J. H., Murphy, R. J., Narayan, R., & Davies, G. B. (2009). Biodegradable and compostable alternatives to
conventional plastics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2127-2139.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0289

17.

Reference list (pictures)
• https://inteng-storage.s3.amazonaws.com/images/AUGUST/sizes/plastic-waste_resize_md.jpg
• https://ipen.org/sites/default/files/styles/large/public/screen_shot_2019-0813_at_12.50.36_pm.png?itok=EDfmVuvM
• https://advancedwastesolutions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/recycle.jpg

18.

THANK YOU FOR
AT T E N T I O N
English     Русский Rules