A STUDY OF PROVINCIAL LIFE IN ANTHONY TROLLOPE’S AND M. GAPAROV’S LITERARY WORKS     A DIPLOMA PAPER BY Ulanbek Eshbaev
INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………..……3       CHAPTER I Provincial Life in
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER I Provincial Life in Literature Description of Provincial Life in World Literature M. Gaparov and Rural Themes in
CHAPTER II Literary Analysis on M. Gaparov’s and A. Trollope’s Works 2.1. Description about Landscape and Nature 2.2.
CONCLUSION Having studied Gaparov’s and Trollope’s work, I came to the following conclusion. Almost all writers write many
43.45K
Category: literatureliterature

A study of provincial life in anthony trollope’s and m. Gaparov’s literary works

1. A STUDY OF PROVINCIAL LIFE IN ANTHONY TROLLOPE’S AND M. GAPAROV’S LITERARY WORKS     A DIPLOMA PAPER BY Ulanbek Eshbaev

A STUDY OF PROVINCIAL LIFE IN ANTHONY TROLLOPE’S
AND M. GAPAROV’S LITERARY WORKS
A DIPLOMA PAPER BY
Ulanbek Eshbaev

2. INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………..……3       CHAPTER I Provincial Life in

INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………………..……3
CHAPTER I Provincial Life in
Literature…………………………………………………..………………………………………….…6
Description of Provincial Life in World Literature.………………….….…………..…6
1.1. M. Gaparov and Rural Themes in Kyrgyz Literature after WW II……...12
1.2. Trollope as the Best Writer of Describing English Provincial Life…......19
CHAPTER II Literary Analysis on M. Gaparov’s and A. Trollope’s Works.....30
2.1. Description about Landscape and Nature …………………………………..…..30
2.2. Peculiarities of Characterization………………….……………………………..……38
CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………….54
BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………….………………………………………………...…….………..56

3. INTRODUCTION

The topicality
The goal and objective
The novelty
The theoretical value
The practical value
The method

4. CHAPTER I Provincial Life in Literature Description of Provincial Life in World Literature M. Gaparov and Rural Themes in

Kyrgyz Literature after WW II
A. Trollope as the Best Writer of Describing English Provincial Life

5. CHAPTER II Literary Analysis on M. Gaparov’s and A. Trollope’s Works 2.1. Description about Landscape and Nature 2.2.

Peculiarities of Characterization

6. CONCLUSION Having studied Gaparov’s and Trollope’s work, I came to the following conclusion. Almost all writers write many

stories and they regard those stories with deep
nature of provincial life. Moreover, not only in literature, but in real life,
provincial areas have considerably significant role in literature. Writers try to
persuade their readers by making them closer to their work. And to do this, they
have their own style: describing rural features, including landscapes and nature
that surround people. Frankly saying in short, Murza Gaparov and Anthony
Trollope were among the best writers who could express what people, readers,
demand their writings, using provincial life and their features.
English     Русский Rules