Week 2_Practice

1.

School of General Education Disciplines
POLITICAL SCIENCE
WEEK 2.
PRACTICE
2025-2026

2.

The development of
political thought in the
history of civilizations

3.

2. Development of political thought in the
history of civilizations
Discussion on following topics:
2.1 Political ideas of the Ancient East
2.2 Antique political thought
2.3 Political thought of the Middle Ages and Renaissance
2.4 The Modern Era’s political thought
2.5 Kazakhstan’s political thought

4.

Practice Discussions Grading Criteria – 25 points (100%)
Assessment Criterion
Weight
Academic Description
1. Analytical Originality and Critical
Evaluation
20%
Demonstrates exceptional analytical originality by engaging with the subject matter beyond the
scope of the course. Critiques are well-founded, clearly articulated, and supported by
independent reasoning. The work reflects a high level of intellectual engagement and depth.
2. Argumentative Clarity and
Multiperspectival Insight
20%
Presents a coherent and balanced analysis of at least two contrasting perspectives or arguments.
Demonstrates the ability to synthesize complex viewpoints, providing nuanced and sophisticated
interpretations. Argumentation is logically structured and rigorously developed.
3. Evidence of Preparation and
Minimal Reliance on Notes
20%
Exhibits thorough preparation through confident and articulate delivery. Presentation is
conducted with minimal or no dependence on written notes. Excessive reliance on notes will
result in a proportionate deduction in accordance with the degree of dependence.
4. Articulation of Personal Critical
Perspective
20%
Expresses a well-reasoned and comprehensive personal viewpoint. The critical position is
substantiated with appropriate examples or evidence and is conveyed in a coherent, scholarly
manner. Demonstrates intellectual independence and critical reflection.
5. Active Participation in Scholarly
Discussion
20%
Engages meaningfully in academic debate and dialogue. Demonstrates attentive listening and
contributes constructively by asking pertinent, topic-related questions. Participation reflects a
sustained engagement with the course content and peer contributions.
Total
100%

5.

• Reading Resources:
• Marcus A.Stadelmann (2020) –
part 4