Promotion of collaborative consumption for providing sustainable urban development

1.

NATIONAL RESEARCH UNIVERSITY HIGHER SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS,
ST. PETERSBURG
SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND AREA STUDIES
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
“PROMOTION OF COLLABORATIVE
CONSUMPTION FOR PROVIDING
SUSTAINABLE URBAN DEVELOPMENT”
Nargiz I. Mamedova, BPA 162
Linguistic Advisor:
Irina N. Shapovalova, Tutor
Research Advisor:
Anna G. Sanina, Docent at the Department of Public Administration and Local Government,
Candidate of Sociological Sciences
Saint-Petersburg, 2020

2.

The name of the unit, laboratory, faculty, etc.
ABSTRACT
• collaborative consumption as an economic model is increasingly being considered as a part of a methodology for
improving the quality of the urban environment
• interest of state authorities in introducing the sharing economy as part of the development strategy of state city
services
• analysis of the costs and benefits of stimulating shared consumption by government
Keywords: sharing economy; collaborative consumption; urban environment; cost-benefit analysis

3.

The name of the unit, laboratory, faculty, etc.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose: to prove the positive influence of stimulating the concept of
collaborative consumption on the level of quality of the urban environment,
and also to measure the volume of this influence
Objectives:
• to describe the concept of the quality of the urban environment from
the perspective of various studies and the state regulatory framework
• to describe approaches to implementing the concept of collaborative
consumption in the areas of the urban environment
• to analyze the positive impact of the introduction of the sharing
economy and to develop recommendations for Russian government
bodies management.

4.

The name of the unit, laboratory, faculty, etc.
METHODS
Costs and benefits of stimulating collaborative consumption concept as an instrument of providing
sustainable urban environment development
1.list of the main costs and benefits of implementing the concept of collaborative consumption in the framework of
the state project
2.indicator for calculating cost-benefit analysis is the net present value (NPV)

5.

The name of the unit, laboratory, faculty, etc.
RESULTS ANTICIPATED
• It is assumed that the total monetary equivalent of benefits will exceed the amount of costs and
the concept of joint consumption will become a government project that will help to improve the
quality of the urban environment.
NPV>0

6.

The name of the unit, laboratory, faculty, etc.
CONCLUSION
• the amount of benefits of introducing the sharing economy as a state project is determined
• the concept of the quality of the urban environment in research papers and legal documentation was identified
• the analysis of the regulatory framework in the field of sharing economics was held
• the practice of state regulation of collaborative consumption among the population of different countries of the world was studied
• the main methods for controlling the turnover of funds within the framework of the model were identified
• the volume of needs of the population in the field of joint consumption was estimated
• the analysis of statistics on citizens' expenditures in the framework of joint consumption was held
• the methodology for analyzing the quality level of the urban environment in the context of the concept of joint consumption was formulated
• the benefits and costs of stimulating shared consumption for urban development were analyzed
• conclusions about the confirmation of the hypothesis consisting in determining the existence of the benefits of introducing joint consumption by the city authorities
were drawn

7.

The name of the unit, laboratory, faculty, etc.
REFERENCES
1.
Scaraboto, D. Selling. Sharing, and Everything In Between: The Hybrid Economies of Collaborative Networks. J. Consum. Res. 2015, 42, 152–176.
2.
Alexandra Dana Meila. Susutainable urban mobility in the sharing economy: digital platforms, collaborative governance, and innovative transportation. Addleton Academic
Publishers. 2018. 130-136.
3.
Botsman, R.; Rogers, R. What’s Mine is Yours: The Rise of Collaborative Consumption; Harper Collins: New York, NY, USA, 2010.
4.
Hamari, J.; Sjöklint, M.; Ukkonen, A. The sharing economy: Why people participate in collaborative consumption. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2016, 67, 2047–2059.
5.
Scarlett T.Jin, Hui Kong, Rachel Wu, Daniel Z.Sui. Ridesourcing, the sharing economy, and the future of cities. Elsevier. 2018. 96-104.
6.
Kostina N.N., Matyusheva K.A. Development of the economy of joint consumption in Russia: models, trends, industries. 2019. 16-22.
7.
Ingrid Ballús-Armet, Susan A. Shaheen, Kelly Clonts, David Weinzimmer. Peer-to-Peer Carsharing. Exploring Public Perception and Market Characteristics in the San
Francisco Bay Area, California.
8.
Barbara Hartl, Thomas Sabitzer, Eva Hofmann, Elfriede Penz. “Sustainability is a nice bonus” the role of sustainability in carsharing from a consumer perspective. Journal
of Cleaner Production. 2018. 88-100.
9.
Möhlmann, M. Collaborative consumption: Determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J. Consum. Behav. 2007, 14, 193–207.
10. Habibi, M.R.; Kim, A.; Laroche, M. From Sharing to Exchange: An Extended Framework of Dual Modes of Collaborative Nonownership Consumption. J. Assoc. Consum.
Res. 2016, 1, 277–294.
11. Polterovich V.M. Positive cooperation: factors and mechanisms of evolution. Economic Issues, 2016, no. 11, pp. 5—23. (In Russ.).
12. Bardhi, F.; Eckhardt, G.M. Access-Based Consumption: The Case of Car Sharing. J. Consum. Res. 2012, 39, 881–898.
13. Nica, E.; Potcovaru, A. The Social Sustainability of the Sharing Economy. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2015, 10, 69–75.
14. Pojani, D.; Stead, D. Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities. Sustainability 2015, 7, 7784–7805.
15. Belk, R. You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. J. Bus. Res. 2014, 67, 1595–1600.

8.

English Русский Rules