Similar presentations:
Managerial Ethics & Corporate
1. Slayt 1
hapterFive
Managerial Ethics & Corporate
Social Responsibility
© 2000 by Harcourt, Inc.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
All rights reserved. Requests for permission to make copies of any part of the
work should be mailed to the following address: Permissions Department,
Copyright Inc.,
Harcourt,
© 2000
6277
bySea
Harcourt,
HarborInc.
Drive,
AllOrlando,
rights reserved.
Florida 32887-6777.
2. Ethics
American Forest&
Paper Association
Not easy to define in a precise way, but in a
general sense, ethics is :
• The code of moral principles and values that
govern the behaviors of a person or group
with respect to what is right or wrong.
Ethics sets standards as to what is good or bad
in conduct and decision making.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
3. 3 Domains of Human Action
Obedience is must.Lawmakers, laws,
rules, etc.
Obedience is to
unenforceable norms
and standards.
Obedience is strictly to
oneself. Both individual and
organization enjoy complete
freedom.
Domain of Certified Law
Domain of Ethics
Domain of Free Choice
(Legal Standard)
(Social Standard)
(Personal Standard)
Amount of
Explicit Control
High
obtaining licences,
paying taxes, etc.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Low
using codes of ethics,
choice of religion, #
bus. cond. pol., co.
of dishwashers, etc.
culture, etc. Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
4. Ethical Dilemma
If ethical standards are not codified, disagreementsand dilemmas about proper behaviour will occur.
• This is a situation that arises when all alternative choices
or behaviors have been deemed undesirable
• Potentially negative ethical results, making it hard to
separate right from wrong.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
5. Ethical Dilemma
The individual who must make an ethical choice in an
organization is the moral agent.
Consider the dilemmas facing a moral agent in the following
situations:
1. Your company has been asked to pay a gratuity in somewhere to
speed the processing of an import permit. This is standard
procedure and your company will suffer if you do not pay the
gratuity. Is this different from tipping a maitre d’hotel in a nice
restaurant?
2. You’re Acc. Mng. of a division that is 15.000 $ below profit
targets. Approximately 20.000 $ of office supplies were
delivered on December 21. The accounting rule is to pay
expenses when incurred. The division general manager asks you
not to record the invoice until February.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
6. Criteria For Ethical Decision Making
• Most ethical dilemmas involveA conflict between needs of the part & whole
The individual versus the organization
The organization versus society as a whole
Students For
Responsible Business
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
7. Four Considerations (Ethical Concepts) In Ethical Decision Making
Managers faced with these kinds of tough ethicalchoices often benefit from a normative approach (based
on norms and values) to guide their decision making.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Utilitarian Approach
Individualism Approach
Moral-Rights Approach
Justice Approach
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
8. Utilitarian Approach
“Moral behavior produces the greatest good for thegreatest number”
Under this approach, a decision maker is expected to
consider the effect of each decision alternative on all
parties and select the one that optimizes the
satisfaction for the greatest number of people.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
9. Individualism Approach
“Acts are moral when they promote the individual'sbest long-term interests, which in the end leads to
the greater good”
“Individual self-direction is paramount” (most
important)
Because individualism is easily misinterpreted to
support immediate self-gain, it is not popular in the
highly organized and group-oriented society of
today. Individualism is closest to the domain of free
choice which is described in slide #3.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
10. Moral-Rights Approach
• “Moral decisions are those that best maintain therights of those people affected by them.”
• Human beings have fundamental rights and
liberties that cannot be taken away by an
individual’s decision.
• To make ethical decisions, managers need to avoid
interfering with the fundamental rights of others
(Ex: sexual harassment is unethical because it
violates the right to freedom of conscience).
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
11. “Moral Rights” (could be considered during decision making)
The right of free consentThe right to privacy
The right of freedom of
conscience
The right of free speech
The right to due process
The right to life & safety
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
P.S.
12. Justice Approach
• “Moral Decisions must be based on standardsof equity, fairness, and impartiality”
3 types of Justice Approaches:
Distributive Justice
Procedural Justice
Compensatory Justice
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
13. Distributive Justice
• Treatment of people should not be based onarbitrary characteristics
• People should be treated differently in
proportion to the differences among them
Men & women should not receive different salaries
if they are performing the same job.
However,
people who differ in a substantive way, such as job
skills or job responsibility, can be treated differently
in proportion to the differences in skills or
responsibility among them.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
14. Procedural Justice
• Rules should be clearly stated• Rules should be consistently and impartially
administered
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
15. Compensatory Justice
Individuals should not be held responsible for mattersthey have no control over
Individuals should be compensated for the cost of their
injuries by the party responsible
Questions such as how minority workers should be
compensated for past discrimination are not easy.
However, this approach does justify as ethical behavior
efforts to correct past wrongs, playing fair under the rules
and insisting on job-relevant differences as the basis for
different levels of pay.
Most of the laws guiding HRM are based on the justice
approach.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
16. Challenge of applying these ethical approaches
It is illustrated by decisions facing companies inthe tobacco industry.
Let’s check “U.S. TOBACCO COMPANY”
story (Management, Daft, 4th edition, p.146).
And consider for a moment how you think the
ethics approaches support and refute cigarette
companies’ actions !...
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
17. Factors Affecting Ethical Choices
Moral DevelopmentDeveloped by Stephen M.Peters
• The Manager
• Levels of moral development
Pre-conventional
Conventional
Post-conventional
• The Organization
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
18. The Manager
• Managers bring specific personality and behavioraltraits to the job.
• Personal needs, family influence and religious
background all shape a manager’s value system.
• Specific personality characteristics, such as ego
strength, self-confidence and a strong sense of
independence may enable managers to make
ethical decisions.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
19. 3 levels of Moral Development
Level 3:PostconventionalFollows self-chosen
principles of justice and
Level 2 : Conventional right. Aware that people
hold different values &
Lives up to expectations of seeks creative solutions to
others. Fulfills duties &
ethical dilemmas.
Level 1: Preconventional obligations of social
Balances concern for
system. Upholds laws.
individual with concern for
Follows rules to avoid
common good.
punishment. Acts in own
interest. Obedience for its
own sake.
Leadership Style:
Autocratic / coercive
Employee Behavior:
by Stephen M.Peters
TaskDeveloped
accomplishment
Guiding / encouraging,
team oriented
Transforming, or
servant leadership
Empowered employees,
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt,
All rights reserved.
Work group collaboration
fullInc. participation
20. Social Responsibility
• “The obligation of organization management tomake decisions and take actions that will
contribute to the welfare and interests of society
and organization”
• Separating right from wrong
• Being a good corporate citizen
Many social responsibilities issues are open to
dispute with respect to right and wrong
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
21. Organizational Stakeholders
• Any group within or outside the organization thathas a stake in the organization’s performance.
• Investors, shareholders, employees, customers,
suppliers are considered primary stakeholders.
• Other important stakeholders are the government
and the community.
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
22. Criteria of Corporate Social Performance Total Corporate Responsibility
Contribute to thecommunity & quality of life.
Discretionary
Responsibility
Ethical Responsibility
First
criterion
Be ethical. Do what is
right. Avoid harm.
Obey the law.
Legal Responsibility
Economic Responsibility
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
Be
profitable.
23. Corporate Responses (Actions) to Social Demands
HighProactive
Take social initiatives.
Accommodation
Degree of
Social
Responsibility
Accept ethical responsibility.
Defense
Do only what is legally required.
Obstruction
Low
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Fight all the way.
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.
24. Managing Company Ethics You Need
Levi StraussLeadership
Code of Ethics
Ethical
Structure
Whistle
Blowers
Developed by Stephen M.Peters
Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved.